Austria · Guide
Which Austrian VAT Rate Applies When Two Could
Austria has five VAT rates, and its VAT Act sets the order in which they are asked.
Updated 18 September 2026. Every provision below carries its paragraph, its gazette reference and the date the version cited took effect.
Austrian VAT rates are not a menu. UStG § 10 asks them in a fixed order, and the order sits in the operative words of the paragraph. The 10 percent head opens "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a nicht anzuwenden", and the 13 percent head opens "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a oder Abs. 2 nicht anzuwenden", so 4.9 percent is tested first, then 10 percent, then 13 percent (UStG § 10, in force from 1 July 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 37/2026). The rates themselves are on the five Austrian VAT rates and what each one covers. This article takes what a rate table cannot: which head is asked first, what happens when two of them reach one transaction, and where the rate is settled outside § 10.
- The sentences that create the order
- Express in three places, structural in one
- When two heads inside § 10 both seem to fit
- One supply, one rate, until the act says otherwise
- The exclusivity sentence, and the mixed consignment
- Nineteen percent in Jungholz and Mittelberg
- Where the rate question is settled outside § 10
- The rate on the invoice
- How this page is kept accurate
- Sources
- FAQ

The sentences that create the order
Four clauses do the ordering work and none of them is a rate. Three are the opening words of a subposition, one is a closing sentence, and together they are why a supply that could sit in two heads has one answer.
| Provision | The operative words | What the clause does |
|---|---|---|
| § 10 Abs. 1 | "Die Steuer beträgt für jeden steuerpflichtigen Umsatz 20% der Bemessungsgrundlage" | fixes 20 percent for every taxable supply. It states no condition and defers to nothing |
| § 10 Abs. 1a | "Die Steuer ermäßigt sich auf 4,9% für die Lieferungen und die Einfuhr der in Anlage 3 aufgezählten Gegenstände" | reduces to 4.9 percent. It is the only reduced head opening with no test of another head, which is what puts it first |
| § 10 Abs. 2 | "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a nicht anzuwenden, ermäßigt sich die Steuer auf 10% für" | reaches the 10 percent list only where Abs. 1a does not apply |
| § 10 Abs. 3 | "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a oder Abs. 2 nicht anzuwenden, ermäßigt sich die Steuer auf 13% für" | reaches the 13 percent list only where neither of the two above applies |
| § 10 Abs. 4, third sentence | "Die Regelung gilt nicht für Umsätze, auf welche die Bestimmungen des Abs. 1a, 2 und 3 anzuwenden sind" | stands the 19 percent territorial rate down wherever one of the three reduced heads applies |
The ordering words are not older drafting that a new rate slotted into. One amending act re-enacted Abs. 1a, Abs. 2, Abs. 3, Abs. 4 and Anlage 3 together, so the rate question is a date question too: § 28 Abs. 69 applies them to "Umsätze und sonstige Sachverhalte, die nach dem 30. Juni 2026 ausgeführt werden bzw. sich ereignen". The operative fact is the date the supply is carried out, and the paragraph names no invoice, payment or contract date.
The ordering clauses of UStG § 10, quoted from the version in force from 1 July 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 37/2026.
UStG § 10, version in force from 1 July 2026
Four questions, asked in this order
- question 1 · Abs. 1a
Are the supply and the import concerned exclusively with goods listed in Anlage 3?
yes →4.9%
„Die Steuer ermäßigt sich auf 4,9% …“
no ↓ go to question 2
- question 2 · Abs. 2
Is the supply in one of the ten heads of Abs. 2, among them Anlage 1 goods, residential letting, accommodation and camping?
yes →10%
„Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a nicht anzuwenden …“
no ↓ go to question 3
- question 3 · Abs. 3
Is the supply in one of the eleven surviving heads of Abs. 3, numbered to Z 12 with Z 3 repealed, among them Anlage 2 goods, artists, theatre, cinema and air passenger transport?
yes →13%
„Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a oder Abs. 2 nicht anzuwenden …“
no ↓ go to question 4
- question 4 · Abs. 1
Everything else that is a taxable supply.
→20%
„Die Steuer beträgt für jeden steuerpflichtigen Umsatz 20% …“
structural, not express: Abs. 1 states no condition, the others reduce it
19% for supplies made in Jungholz and Mittelberg by a business established there
Reached only where none of Abs. 1a, Abs. 2 and Abs. 3 applies. Its third sentence says so in terms.
„Die Regelung gilt nicht für Umsätze, auf welche die Bestimmungen des Abs. 1a, 2 und 3 anzuwenden sind.“
The order among the reduced rates is in the operative words of the paragraph. The place of the 20% rate is not: it follows from Abs. 1 fixing it for every taxable supply while the others reduce it.
Express in three places, structural in one
It matters whether a rule is in the act or inferred from it, so this article says which. The order among the three reduced rates is express: the words quoted above are operative text, not a heading or an annotation. The subordination of the 19 percent territorial rate is express too, in the third sentence of Abs. 4.
The position of the 20 percent standard rate is not express. It is structural. Nothing in § 10 says Abs. 1 applies only where nothing else does. Abs. 1 fixes 20 percent for every taxable supply, and Abs. 1a, Abs. 2, Abs. 3 and Abs. 4 each say the tax "ermäßigt sich", is reduced. A reduction presupposes a figure it reduces, and that figure is the one in Abs. 1. The standard rate is the residue by construction, and a page presenting it as the last rung of an express ladder says more than the statute does.
One limit matters, because it is the difference between an ordering rule and an answer. The order decides which head is asked first. It does not decide which head a supply belongs to. That is settled by Anlage 1, Anlage 2, Anlage 3 and the wording of the individual Ziffern, and for a particular supply it is a matter for a licensed Austrian Steuerberater.
When two heads inside § 10 both seem to fit
The order between subpositions does not settle everything, because § 10 also carries cross-references running the other way. A head at 10 percent can point down to a head at 13 percent, and several heads stand aside for an exemption in § 6 rather than for another rate. Each is express, a few words long, and decisive.
The clearest is passenger transport. Abs. 2 Z 6 puts transport "mit Verkehrsmitteln aller Art" in the 10 percent head and then removes what Abs. 3 Z 9 covers. Abs. 3 is reached only where Abs. 2 is not, so the removal is what leaves the aircraft head anything to reach.
| Provision | The words that move it | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Abs. 2 Z 6 | "soweit nicht § 6 Abs. 1 Z 3 oder § 10 Abs. 3 Z 9 anzuwenden ist" | takes air transport out of the 10 percent head, so the 13 percent head in Abs. 3 Z 9 can reach it |
| Abs. 3 Z 9 | "soweit nicht § 6 Abs. 1 Z 3 anzuwenden ist" | the aircraft head itself stands down for the § 6 exemption |
| Abs. 2 Z 4 | "soweit diese Leistungen nicht unter § 6 Abs. 1 fallen" | the non-profit head is conditioned on the whole of § 6 Abs. 1 |
| Abs. 2 Z 8 | "sofern die Umsätze nicht unter § 6 Abs. 1 Z 18 oder 25 fallen" | hospitals, nursing and cure establishments stand down for two named exemptions |
| Abs. 3 Z 6 | "sofern sie nicht unter § 6 Abs. 1 Z 24 oder 25 fallen" | theatre, music and museum supplies stand down for two named exemptions |
| Abs. 3 Z 10 | "sofern sie nicht unter § 6 Abs. 1 Z 23 oder 25 fallen" | youth and training homes stand down for two named exemptions |
| Abs. 2 Z 9 | "Z 2 gilt sinngemäß" | applies the Z 2 hiring rule to electronic publications, themselves defined by reference to Anlage 1 Z 33 |
So the answer has two layers: wherever a Ziffer says so, the exemption question comes first, and an exempt supply has no rate to choose between.
The cross-references inside UStG § 10, in force from 1 July 2026, that move a supply between heads or stand a head down for an exemption. The exemptions are in § 6, in force from 1 January 2026.
One supply, one rate, until the act says otherwise
The hardest version of the question is one contract carrying more than one thing. § 10 states no general rule about ancillary supplies. It legislates particular cases, in both directions, within a single Ziffer.
A supply of heat made as an ancillary service is pushed out of the 10 percent head three times over: Abs. 2 Z 3 lit. a excepts it from residential letting, lit. b from the supplies of an owners' association, and Z 4 from the non-profit head.
Two litterae later the same concept works the other way. Abs. 2 Z 3 lit. c taxes accommodation in furnished rooms at 10 percent together with "die regelmäßig damit verbundenen Nebenleistungen (einschließlich Beheizung)", and pulls a customary local breakfast into the same head "wenn der Preis hiefür im Beherbergungsentgelt enthalten ist", where its price is contained in the accommodation charge. Lit. d does the same for camping, so far as a single charge is paid.
Heating is therefore inside the accommodation head and outside the residential-letting head, two letters apart in one Ziffer.
UStG § 10 Abs. 2, version in force from 1 July 2026
One contract, two directions
Heating with accommodation
A regularly connected ancillary service of accommodation in furnished rooms, heating named in the text.
Z 3 lit. c
Breakfast with accommodation
A customary local breakfast, but only where its price is contained in the accommodation charge.
„wenn der Preis hiefür im Beherbergungsentgelt enthalten ist“
Z 3 lit. c
Camping ancillaries
The regularly connected ancillary services of a camping letting, so far as a single charge is paid for them.
Z 3 lit. d
Heat with residential letting
A supply of heat made as an ancillary service is excepted from the residential letting head.
„ausgenommen eine als Nebenleistung erbrachte Lieferung von Wärme“
Z 3 lit. a
Heat with an owners association
The same exception, in the head for supplies made to maintain commonly owned parts of a residential property.
Z 3 lit. b
Heat from a non-profit body
The same exception again, among the supplies the non-profit head does not reach.
Z 4
The same concept, Nebenleistung, carries opposite results two litterae apart in one Ziffer. Neither side is an inference: both are the words of the subposition.
The exclusivity sentence, and the mixed consignment
The head asked first carries the narrowest condition, and it is a second sentence that is easy to drop when the rate is summarised. § 10 Abs. 1a reduces the tax to 4.9 percent for the goods listed in Anlage 3 on supply and on import, and then adds:
Dies gilt nur, wenn die Lieferungen und die Einfuhr ausschließlich Gegenstände betreffen, die nur in der jeweiligen Position bzw. Unterposition der Kombinierten Nomenklatur der Anlage 3 aufgezählt sind.
This applies only where the supply and the import concern exclusively goods listed under the particular Combined Nomenclature position or subposition named in the annex. It restricts the head rather than describing it, and it is how a transaction plainly including a listed good can still fall out of the first question into the second. The list itself is on the five Austrian VAT rates and what each one covers and in Anlage 3, in force from 1 July 2026.
Nineteen percent in Jungholz and Mittelberg
The fifth rate is territorial, and it is the one whose conditions are about the supplier rather than the supply. § 10 Abs. 4 reduces the tax to 19 percent for supplies within § 1 Abs. 1 Z 1 and Z 2 made in the areas of Jungholz and Mittelberg by a business with a residence or seat, a habitual abode or a permanent establishment in those areas. Without that connection a business does not get the rate for a supply it makes there.
Three limits sit in the same paragraph. It does not reach the supply or letting of motor vehicles to recipients whose residence or seat is elsewhere in Austria, nor supplies to a permanent establishment elsewhere in Austria. And by its third sentence it does not apply where Abs. 1a, Abs. 2 or Abs. 3 does, so a listed Anlage 3 good supplied in Jungholz takes 4.9 percent and not 19 percent.
It never reaches an import, twice over. Abs. 4 names only § 1 Abs. 1 Z 1 and Z 2, supplies and own consumption, not Z 3, import. And § 1 Abs. 1 Z 3 defines an import as a good arriving from third territory "in das Inland, ausgenommen die Gebiete Jungholz und Mittelberg".
Have a supply that could sit in two heads?
Send the legal form of the company, what the supply consists of and where it is made. We will name the provisions that govern it and the order they are asked in. Where the answer is reserved to a licensed Austrian Steuerberater, we say so instead of answering it.
Where the rate question is settled outside § 10
Provisions outside § 10 can decide the rate before § 10 is reached. UStG § 26a creates a special arrangement for declaring and paying import VAT on goods whose individual value per consignment does not exceed EUR 150, available to the person who presents them to customs in Austria in the name of the person for whom they are destined, and closed to excise goods and to anyone using § 25b. Its Abs. 4, in force since 1 July 2026 under the same amending act as the rate, reads: "§ 10 Abs. 1a bis 4 findet für Einfuhren von Gegenständen im Rahmen dieser Sonderregelung keine Anwendung." Every reduced rate and the territorial rate are switched off for an import declared that way, whatever the goods are.
| Provision | What it settles | Version cited |
|---|---|---|
| UStG § 6 | whether the supply is exempt at all. Where a Ziffer of § 10 defers to it, the exemption comes first and an exempt supply has no rate | in force from 1 January 2026 |
| UStG § 26a Abs. 4 | switches off § 10 Abs. 1a to Abs. 4 for an import under the EUR 150 arrangement, leaving the Abs. 1 rate | in force from 1 July 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 37/2026 |
| UStG § 28 Abs. 69 | which version of § 10 and Anlage 3 governs, by the date the supply is carried out | in force from 30 July 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 62/2026 |
| UStG § 1 Abs. 1 Z 3 | that a good arriving in Jungholz or Mittelberg from third territory is not an import for this Act at all | in force from 24 December 2025 |
Four provisions outside UStG § 10 that decide, or remove, the rate question: § 26a, § 28, § 6 and § 1.
The rate on the invoice
The ordering question reaches paper where a rate has to be written down. UStG § 11 Abs. 1 Z 3 lit. e requires an invoice to state the consideration under § 4 and the applicable tax rate, or, where the supply is exempt, a reference to the exemption. The rate is a content requirement, not optional information.
Abs. 5 legislates for the case this article is about. Where an invoice covers supplies subject to different rates, the considerations and the tax amounts are to be separated by rate, and where the tax is computed and printed by machine a single total is permitted only if each item shows its rate.
Two provisions say what follows when the amount shown is not the amount owed. Abs. 12 makes a business liable by reason of the invoice for a tax amount it has shown to another business and does not owe under the Act, unless it corrects the invoice to the recipient, § 16 Abs. 1 applying. Abs. 14 reaches an amount shown with no supply or no business behind it. What to do about an invoice already issued is reserved and is not answered here; the number itself is covered on the Austrian UID and where it has to appear.

How this page is kept accurate
Last updated 18 September 2026. Every provision quoted above was read on that date in the consolidated text published as open data by the Bundeskanzleramt, and each link points at the paragraph and version the sentence rests on, not at the act as a whole.
This page describes Austrian law. It is not tax advice. Which head a particular supply falls under, and what to do about an invoice already issued, are questions Austrian law reserves to a licensed Steuerberater (WTBG 2017 § 2 Abs. 1), and nothing here is written as an answer to them.
Sources
All read on 18 September 2026 through the RIS open-data API and checked as the paragraph cited.
- UStG 1994 § 10, in force from 1 July 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 37/2026: the rates, the ordering clauses, the exclusivity sentence, the Ziffern in tables 1 and 2.
- UStG 1994 § 28, in force from 30 July 2026: Abs. 69, the commencement and the date-of-supply rule.
- UStG 1994 § 26a, in force from 1 July 2026: the EUR 150 arrangement and Abs. 4.
- UStG 1994 § 11, in force from 24 December 2025: Abs. 1 Z 3 lit. e, Abs. 5, Abs. 12, Abs. 14.
- UStG 1994 § 6, in force from 1 January 2026: the exemptions § 10 defers to.
- UStG 1994 § 1, in force from 24 December 2025: Abs. 1 Z 1, Z 2 and Z 3.
- UStG 1994 Anlage 3, in force from 1 July 2026: the 4.9 percent schedule.
- USP, VAT rates and tax exemptions, official English summary, last updated 1 July 2026.
Anlage 1 and Anlage 2 are named in the text and not linked: only Anlage 3 was read in full here, and a link stands for a document that has been read.
Frequently asked questions
If two Austrian VAT rates could apply to one supply, which one wins?
UStG § 10 answers it in its own words. The 10 percent head in Abs. 2 opens "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a nicht anzuwenden", and the 13 percent head in Abs. 3 opens "Ist der Steuersatz nach Abs. 1a oder Abs. 2 nicht anzuwenden". So 4.9 percent is asked first, then 10 percent, then 13 percent.
Is the order of the Austrian VAT rates express in the statute, or read into it?
Both, in different places. The order of the three reduced rates is express, in the opening words of UStG § 10 Abs. 2 and Abs. 3, and Abs. 4 expressly stands down where Abs. 1a, 2 or 3 applies. The place of the 20 percent standard rate at the end is structural: no sentence says it goes last.
Where does the 20 percent standard rate sit in the Austrian order?
At the end, by construction rather than by an ordering sentence. UStG § 10 Abs. 1 fixes 20 percent for every taxable supply, and Abs. 1a, 2, 3 and 4 each say the tax "ermäßigt sich", is reduced. A reduction presupposes the figure it reduces, so 20 percent is what is left.
When did the Austrian VAT rate order change, and what changed with it?
On 1 July 2026. BGBl. I Nr. 37/2026 re-enacted UStG § 10 Abs. 1a, Abs. 2, Abs. 3, Abs. 4 and Anlage 3 in one amendment, so the 4.9 percent rate and the words that put it first arrived together. The commencement is in § 28 Abs. 69 of the same act.
Which supplies take the new Austrian rates and which take the old ones?
UStG § 28 Abs. 69 applies the amended § 10 and Anlage 3 to "Umsätze und sonstige Sachverhalte, die nach dem 30. Juni 2026 ausgeführt werden bzw. sich ereignen". The date the supply is carried out decides which version governs it. The paragraph names no invoice date and no payment date.
Can one Austrian invoice carry supplies at more than one VAT rate?
Yes, and UStG § 11 Abs. 5 legislates for it. Where an invoice covers supplies subject to different rates, the considerations and the tax amounts are to be separated by rate. Where a machine computes and prints the tax, one total is permitted if each item on the invoice shows its rate.
What rate does heat supplied with a residential letting take in Austria?
UStG § 10 Abs. 2 Z 3 lit. a puts the letting of land for residential purposes in the 10 percent head and then excepts "eine als Nebenleistung erbrachte Lieferung von Wärme", a supply of heat made as an ancillary service. Z 3 lit. b and Z 4 carry the same exception in their own words.
Is breakfast taxed at the Austrian accommodation rate?
UStG § 10 Abs. 2 Z 3 lit. c treats a customary local breakfast as an ancillary service of accommodation "wenn der Preis hiefür im Beherbergungsentgelt enthalten ist", where its price is contained in the accommodation charge. The condition the statute writes is about the price, not about the meal.
Why is passenger transport by air 13 percent in Austria when other passenger transport is 10 percent?
Because two carve-outs work together. UStG § 10 Abs. 2 Z 6 puts passenger transport by vehicles of all kinds in the 10 percent head "soweit nicht § 6 Abs. 1 Z 3 oder § 10 Abs. 3 Z 9 anzuwenden ist", and Abs. 3 Z 9 is the aircraft head at 13 percent.
Do the Austrian reduced rates apply to a low-value import under the special arrangement?
No. UStG § 26a Abs. 4, in force since 1 July 2026, reads "§ 10 Abs. 1a bis 4 findet für Einfuhren von Gegenständen im Rahmen dieser Sonderregelung keine Anwendung". The arrangement covers goods whose individual value per consignment does not exceed EUR 150, presented to customs by the person named in Abs. 1.
Where does the 19 percent Jungholz and Mittelberg rate sit in the order?
Last, and expressly. UStG § 10 Abs. 4 sets 19 percent for supplies within § 1 Abs. 1 Z 1 and Z 2 made in those areas by a business with a residence, seat, habitual abode or permanent establishment there, and its third sentence disapplies it wherever Abs. 1a, Abs. 2 or Abs. 3 applies.
What does Austrian law do when an invoice shows a VAT amount that is not owed?
UStG § 11 Abs. 12 makes a business that shows such an amount to another business liable for it by reason of the invoice, unless it corrects the invoice to the recipient, § 16 Abs. 1 applying to the correction. Abs. 14 covers an amount shown where there is no supply or no business behind it.
Does an Austrian VAT exemption come before or after the rate question?
Before it, wherever § 10 says so. Several heads are expressly conditioned on § 6 Abs. 1: Abs. 2 Z 4 and Z 8, and Abs. 3 Z 6, Z 9 and Z 10 each apply only so far as the named exemption does not. An exempt supply has no rate to choose between.
Related
- Company Registration Austria: VAT in Austria: the five rates, who has to charge them, the filing dates and the surcharges.
- Company Registration Austria: Austrian VAT Number (UID / ATU): how the number is applied for, and where it has to appear.
- Company Registration Austria: VAT Registration in Austria: registration, the waiver declaration and fiscal representation.